Get Permission Chatura and Muniswamyreddy: Histologic pattern analysis of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma at a tertiary care hospital in South India


Introduction

Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), first described by Jacob in 1827, is the most common cutaneous tumor, accounting for approximately 70% of all malignant diseases of the skin worldwide. Although the incidence of BCC is low in the Asian population when compared to Caucasians, the burden of the disease on the health care system may be high owing to a large population with a high absolute number of cases.1, 2, 3, 4

Various authors describe many histological types of BCC, causing a lack of unified and accepted classification. The two important criteria used in classifying BCCs include histologic growth pattern and histologic differentiation, with the former having greatest biologic significance. An attempt at a simplified, accurate histologic classification of BCC based on histologic growth patterns is done in this study. This classification further paved way to the concept of risk typing BCC into low-risk and high-risk types. High risk types exhibit more aggressive behavior locally, higher rate of subclinical tumour spread and local recurrence along with a higher probability of incomplete excision. The primary goal of classification is to predict natural history, ie, high or low risk for recurrence and to effectively manage the patient. As the literature on BCC in India is scarce with lack of studies implementing risk typing, this study was undertaken with special focus on studying the tumor’s biologic behavior, which correlates with its histologic growth pattern and risk typing. Furthermore risk typing guides current management of BCC. If the tumor subtypes are of high risk type, they usually require more decisive treatment.5

BCCs also need to be analyzed for their size, site, the frequency of its subtypes and the various factors which influence it, to develop and implement effective treatment strategies.6

Materials and Methods

The material for this retrospective study comprised skin biopsies of patients histopathologically diagnosed as BCC received in the Department of Pathology, over a timespan of eight and half years (2010-2018). Clinical details were collected; specimens were studied after fixation in 10% formalin. Representative areas were sampled and sectioned to obtain 5 micron thick paraffin sections. Microscopic findings of H&E stained sections were histopathologically studied, subtyped and further categorized into high and low risk types based on ‘NICE Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes for People with Skin Tumors including Melanoma (update): The Management of Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas in the Community May 2010’. IHC staining for BerEP4 was done in ten diagnostically challenging cases.

The data collected was entered in MS excel and analyzed using SPSS software version 16.0. The categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Chi square test was employed for assessing the association between categorical variables. Fischer’s exact test was used for checking association between categorical variables when the expected frequencies of more than 20% of the cells was below five. A p value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the results are presented in appropriate tables and figures.

Results

A total of 91 specimens were received from 79 cases of BCC. 8 cases had both incision and excision biopsy, and in one case excision biopsy was followed by a recurrent lesion biopsied after 16 months. Two cases had biopsy from 3 and 2 sites respectively. High risk type of BCC (83.5 %) was more common than low risk type. The parameters used to risk categorize BCC is tabulated (Table 1). Of the 66 high risk cases, 63 were located in the facial region. There was significant association between location of the lesion and risk typing of basal cell carcinoma (p<0.05).

BCCs presented over a wide range of age from 8 years to 82 years, with a mean of 58 and 59 years for high risk cases and low risk cases respectively. Early development of BCC in high risk cases especially in sun exposed sites was seen in genetically predisposed patients. 3 cases of Xeroderma pigmentosa (XP) of ages 8, 10 and 22 years had basosquamous carcinoma (BSCC), a 38 year female with oculocutaneous albinism (OCA) had BCCs and BSCC & one 72 year old male patient with Nevus sebaceous (NS) had BCC.

A female preponderance was seen with an incidence of 65.15% in high risk BCC and 61.53% for low risk BCC respectively. Cephalic lesions, were more commonly seen, when compared to extra cephalic lesions with periocular region being the commonest site. High risk cases comprised of lesions in surgically difficult or cosmetically sensitive anatomical sites like periocular, nose, ear and lip regions.

Nodular BCC (30) was the most common subtype followed by the mixed type (19) in the high risk category. Of the 13 cases in the low risk group, 11 were of nodular type and one case each of fibroepithelioma of Pinkus and superficial type. Peripheral palisading and retraction clefts were identified easily and often seen, squamous differentiation was more commonly seen in low risk BCC. BCC was diagnosed only after multiple serial sections were taken in two cases. Perineural infiltration was seen in 04 cases and calcification was seen in 07 cases. A 65 year old male presenting with an ulcerated lesion on the dorsum of the foot showed BCC with osseous metaplasia. Of the 66 high risk cases, 44 has ulcerations as compared to 9 of the 13 low risk cases that did not have ulcerations. Ulceration was significantly associated with the risk typing of basal cell carcinoma. The other microscopic findings observed are as tabulated (p=0.01). (Table 2)

The majority of patients were referrals from general surgeons (34.6%), others were from ophthalmologists (28.2%), dermatologists (12.8%), plastic surgeons (7.6%) and otorhinolaryngologists (8.9%). 7.9% of patients had no documented referral source in the hospital notes.

Table 1

Parameters used to risk categorize BCC

Parameters

High (66)

Low (13)

p value

Age (In years)

< 20

2

0

0.97

21 – 40

5

0

41 – 60

29

6

61 – 80

28

7

>81

2

0

Sex

Female

43

8

0.94

Male

23

5

Genetic predisposition

Present

5

0

0.68

Absent

61

13

Recurrence

Present

3

0

1.0

Absent

63

13

Margin Involvement

Present

19

0

0.06

Absent

47

13

Site

Face

63

6

0.00

Neck

2

0

Trunk

1

4

Lower limbs

0

3

Histologic type

Nodular

30

11

0.33

Mixed

19

-

Infiltrative

9

-

BSCC

4

-

Superficial

2

1

Morpheic

2

-

FE of Pinkus

-

1

Table 2

Microscopic features in BCC

Parameters

High (66)

Low(13)

p value

Solar elastosis

Present

5

0

0.68

Absent

61

13

Ulceration

Present

44

4

0.01

Absent

22

9

Regression

Active

62

12

0.68

Absent

4

1

Peripheral palisade

Present

66

13

1.0

Absent

0

0

Retraction cleft

Present

60

13

0.57

Absent

6

0

Pigment

Present

40

7

0.64

Absent

26

6

Ripple pattern

Present

4

0

0.82

Absent

62

13

*Inflammatory cells in stroma

L&P

61

12

0.82

LF

1

1

M

3

0

Absent

1

0

Stroma

Fibrosing

58

10

0.54

None

8

3

Squamous Differentiation

Present

22

5

0.97

Absent

44

8

Mucin

Present

3

0

1.0

Absent

63

13

[i] *L&P: lymphocytes and plasma cells, LF: lymphoid follicle, M: macrophage

Figure 1

68 year old lady with a noduloulcerative lesion in the left periocular region.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/aa32306b-c7ef-406f-ad1e-ed2c274ff6b6image1.jpeg
Figure 2

An ulcerative lesion on the nose in an adult male patient.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/9e68ba79-bbac-45e3-aece-1aae49867c21/image/72dc62b9-65e7-4017-98bf-f3c66594f17e-u1.png
Figure 3

Noduoulcerative lesion on the nose along with freckles over the face in a ten year old child with Xeroderma Pigmentosa.

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/9e68ba79-bbac-45e3-aece-1aae49867c21/image/7798491a-726d-4bdd-971d-69aba430c8b1-u1.png
Figure 4

Infiltrating type of BCC showing infiltrating nests and strands of basaloid cells (H&E 10X)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/9e68ba79-bbac-45e3-aece-1aae49867c21/image/bdbcfc20-20ce-4abc-9d72-dc1b5da9d02e-u1.png
Figure 5

BerEP4 staining in a case of BCC showing strong and diffuse membrane positivity. (BerEP4 10X)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/9e68ba79-bbac-45e3-aece-1aae49867c21/image/8083a0f9-6fdd-4979-8604-6e90cdec253d-u1.png
Figure 6

Nodular BCC showing nests of basal cells with peripheral palisading and retraction clefts with stromal lymphocytic infitrate. (H&E 40X)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/9e68ba79-bbac-45e3-aece-1aae49867c21/image/aedac524-690a-4b92-a0da-edbb379e1bbb-u1.png

Discussion

BCC is the most common skin cancer worldwide and constitutes a significant and costly health problem despite having low mortality rates. Although a significant variation in the incidence of BCC is noted depending upon ethnicity and geographic location, an increasing incidence is reported worldwide due to a larger amount of ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth’s surface owing to the depletion of the ozone layer. 1, 2, 3, 4 Although most studies report an increase in the incidence of BCCs, 7 we noticed an undulating trend with a steady increase in the number of cases between 2011 and 2013 and a peak rise in 2014.8 Further, the number of cases reported decreased from 2015 to 2017 with small peak in 2018. 9 An uncertainity in the trend of cases reported may be attributed to changes in reporting practices or an actual increase in the number of cases, which highlights the need for cautious interpretation of data. 7, 10, 11, 9

The main aim of classification of BCC is to predict its natural history, i.e high or low risk for recurrence. There is an absence of uniform histological classification of BCC as there is a confusion whether to classify BCC based on growth pattern or histologic differentiation. A growth pattern based classification has been adopted by the Royal College of Pathologists in its minimum dataset for the reporting of skin cancers as it has the best correlation with tumour biology. 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Clinical criteria for classifying cases into high and low risk types as outlined in the ‘NICE Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes for People with Skin Tumors including Melanoma (update): The Management of Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas in the Community May 2010’ was implemented in this study.17

66 cases of BCC were classified as high risk and 13 cases as low risk BCC in our study. This risk stratification of BCCs based on growth patterns may help in uniform reporting with substantial agreement between dematopathologists.

The most commonly affected age group in this study was >60 years of age (45.56%) followed by 41-60 years, which closely resemble studies conducted in North India and Turkey. 1, 6 A cumulative effect of ultraviolet radiation induced DNA damage and a decreased efficiency of DNA repair and immune surveillance mechanisms associated with aging may be the cause for increased incidence of BCC in older individuals. 1 4 patients out of 6 that presented below 40 years of age had genetic diseases (3- XP and 1- OCA) predisposing them to develop BCC. One patient of XP had a sister with similar lesions.1 case of BCC in a 70 year old male had NS.

BCCs are more commonly seen in male patients as reported in many studies, 19 but we noticed an unusual female preponderance in our study which is consistent with the findings of another Indian study. Indian women especially those in rural areas are exposed intermittently to UVR as their main occupation is farming and due to cooking in open kitchens. A higher frequency of BCC noted in females in our study could be attributed to intermittent exposure to UVR which is implicated in the pathogenesis of BCC. 1

Majority of the lesions in our study were found to involve the head and neck region (89.87%) with periocular (31.64%), nose (15.18%), cheek (15.18%), forehead (10.12%) and ear (8.86%) being the most commonly involved areas. These regions constitute the most central and prominent part of the head and neck region and are more prone to exposure to chronic sunlight. Most of our patients belong to this category probably as they are from rural areas who work during daytime as agricultural labourers. An embryologic role in the pathogenesis of BCC also has been hypothesized as there is a correlation between the common sites of occurrence of BCC and embryologic fusion planes in the head and neck area. The presence of embryological stem cells in clusters with special biology/ physiology along these fusion planes predisposing the development of BCC has been proposed. 20, 8 The proportion of BCCs along these embryologic fusion planes were much higher (59.62%) than lesions at non cleft sites in our study.

Of the 123 periocular tumors studied in a period of 5 years (2011-2016), 23 cases were BCC, common in females (20 cases), and the most common age group was 60–69, ulcerated lesion being the most common presentation and 31.8% of the lesions were in the medial canthus. One patient showed a recurrent lesion 15 months following excision while another patient presented with three lesions, one involving the periocular region and other two involving the neck. Identification of lesions at the earliest can reduce the associated morbidity and recurrences. 21

BCC in unusual sites which can be underestimated and be dangerous to patients deserve a special mention. 8 were located on covered / unusual sites of the body which includes three on the abdomen, two on the back and three on the lower extremity, which include the shin, ankle and foot. 22, 23

BCCs can exhibit a wide spectrum of histologic phenotypes, and upto 26 subtypes have been described. 24 BCCs have been traditionally classified based on differentiation patterns and clinical appearance like adenoid, keratotic, pigmented and so on although it holds no prognostic significance in most cases. 5 We attempted to simplify the histologic classification and hence used a histopathological classification combining both an assessment of the histological growth pattern and differentiation features. Eight types of growth patterns were recognized- nodular, superficial, morpheic, micronodular, infiltrative, mixed, BSCC and FE of Pinkus. A histologic type was assigned to each case, the pattern constituting more than 50 % of the tumor area or when it involved the invading part of the tumor and risk type was assigned after considering the clinical details of the patient. Superimposed on this classification was an assessment of differentiation. The presence of cystic, adenoid or keratotic features was considered as evidence of differentiation; otherwise tumors were classified as solid (undifferentiated). The most common subtype of BCC was nodular constituting 51.89% of the cases followed by mixed histologic type (24.05%). Importantly, all of the mixed subtypes contained a high risk histologic type.

Each subtype has an associated biological behavior that can affect the likelihood of tumor recurrence and treatment modality. Infiltrative, morpheic, BSCC and micronodular BCC are high risk histologic types and have a high likelihood of incomplete excision and recurrence.

The exact classification of FE of Pinkus is debatable as some consider it as fenestrated variant of trichoblastoma while others consider it as a variant of BCC. A polypoidal lesion noted in a 46 year old male patient on the ankle, showed thin anastomosing strands of basaloid cells, two to three cells thick, surrounded by abundant stroma and terminated in nubbins of basaloid cells was diagnosed as FE of Pinkus and it was considered a low risk histologic type. 25, 26

BSCC a challenging rare tumour which lies between the two extremes of BCC and SCC needs to be differentiated from other cutaneous malignancies as it is aggressive, patients tend to have a poor prognosis due to higher rate of local recurrence and metastasis and require constant monitoring. Four cases of BSCC were seen in our study; three in patients with XP and one in a patient with OCA. The diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer at an early age often conceals an underlying hereditary trait. It is of great importance in this part of the world to register these individuals early in life, educate them about the damaging effect of sun to prevent progression of premalignant lesions to malignant and detect and treat premalignant and malignant lesions early to reduce morbidity. Patients with high risk BCCs were younger when genetically predisposed and presented with larger, ulcerated tumors on cosmetically sensitive sun damaged skin that were incompletely excised in comparison to patients with low risk BCC. 26, 27

Majority (60.75%) of the high risk BCCs were ulcerated, 24.05% of them had positive excision margins and 6.3% of the cases were associated with solar elastosis. Histologically, low risk BCCs harbored a lymphocyte rich rather than plasma cell rich inflammatory infiltrate and showed more foci of active regression and stromal alterations of either a gain or loss of fibrosing tumor stroma. Features of old regression were not seen in both high and low risk categories. On comparing the histologic typing of incision and excision biopsies a concordance rate of 55.56% was noted in our study. A broad and deep incision biopsy specimen depicting the superficial and deep aspects of the tumour is imperative to accurately subtype BCC. 28

BCC of all subtypes show strong and diffuse membranous staining for BerEP4 antibody. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) is negative in BCC and shows focal positivity in squamous and keratotic areas. 29 We performed BerEP4 staining on ten cases of BCC all of which showed strong and diffuse membranous staining.

There was metastasis in only one case in our study following three recurrences over a period of 7 years. Recurrence only was seen in two cases all of them involving the periocular region. Margin involvement was seen in both of these excision biopsies. The recurrent lesions were noted five years and one year and four months following primary excision in two patients and such information was not available in hospital records regarding the other patient. We are unaware of recurrences that could have occurred since the termination of the study.

Conclusion

BCC is a major health problem in a country like India owing to a large population. A simplified histological classification along with risk typing was done to achieve uniformity in reporting format among practicing Pathologists and to achieve substantial agreement between Pathologists and Dermatologists. Early diagnosis and treatment of patients is imperative to reduce morbidity among patients and thereby reducing financial burden of the disease overall. This study might help further guide other studies and also introduce health programs to help develop treatment, preventive and educational strategies to control BCC.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Source of Funding

The authors have not received financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgement

The authors sincerely thank Dr Anand. R, Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Pondicherry for his help with statistical evaluation.

References

1 

S Kumar BB Mahajan S Kaur A Yadav N Singh A Singh A study of Basal cell carcinoma in South Asians for risk factor and clinicopathological characterization: A hospital based studyJ Skin Cancer201417358210.1155/2014/173582

2 

V Malik KS Goh S Leong A Tan D Downey D O’ Donovan Risk and outcome analysis of 1832 consecutively excised basal cell carcinomas in a tertiary referral plastic surgery unitJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg20106312205763

3 

P T Bradford Skin cancer in skin of colorDermatol Nurs20092141707

4 

S V Deo S Hazarika N K Shukla S Kumar M Kar A Samaiya Surgical management of skin cancers: experience from a regional cancer centre in North IndiaIndian J Cancer200542314550

5 

Y Vantuchová R Čuřík Histological types of basal cell carcinomaScripta Medica (BRNO)2006795-626170

6 

S Hakverdi DD Balci CA Dogramaci S Toprak M Yaldiz Retrospective analysis of basal cell carcinomaIndian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol201177225110.4103/0378-6323.77483

7 

MA Rawashdeh I Matalka Basal cell carcinoma of the maxillofacial region: site distribution and incidence rates in Arab/Jordanians, 1991 to 2000J Oral Maxillofac Surg2004622145910.1016/j.joms.2003.04.009

8 

DT Netscher M Spira Basal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview of Tumor Biology and TreatmentPlast Reconstr Surg20041135749410.1097/01.PRS.0000113025.69154.D1

9 

SA Holme KM Malinovszky DL Roberts Changing trends in non-melanoma skin cancer in South Wales, 1988-98Br J Dermatol2000143612249

10 

MR Karagas ER Greengerg ST Spencer TA Stukel LA Mott Increase in incidence rates of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer in New Hampshire, USAInt J Cancer19998145559

11 

PG Buettner BA Raasch Incidence rates of skin cancer in Townsville, AustraliaInt J Cancer199878558793

12 

JJ Rippey Why classify basal cell carcinomas?Histopathology19983253938

13 

AL Haws R Rojano SR Tahan TL Phung Accuracy of biopsy sampling for subtyping basal cell carcinomaJ Am Acad Dermatol201266110611

14 

R Betti E Inselvini M Carducci C Crosti Age and site prevalence of histologic subtypes of basal cell carcinomasInt J Dermatol1995343174610.1111/j.1365-4362.1995.tb01561.x

15 

S Boulinguez C Grison-Tabone L Lamant S Valmary R Viraben, J M Bonnetblanc Histological evolution of recurrent basal cell carcinoma and therapeutic implications for incompletely excised lesionsBr J Dermatol20041513623610.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06135.x

16 

G Saldanha A Fletcher D N Slater Basal cell carcinoma: a dermatopathological and molecular biological updateBr J Dermatol2003148219520210.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05151.x

17 

D N Slater P H Mckee Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of common skin cancersLondon: The Royal College of Pathologists2002123

18 

JP Sloane The value of typing basal cell carcinomas in predicting recurrence after surgical excisionBr J Dermatol197796212715910.1111/j.1365-2133.1977.tb12533.x

19 

P Kaur M Mulvaney JA Carlson Basal cell carcinoma progression correlates with host immune response and stromal alterations: a histologic analysisAm J Dermatopathol200628429330710.1097/00000372-200608000-00002

20 

G Nicoletti F Brenta A Malovini O Jaber A Faga Sites of Basal cell carcinomas and head and neck congenital clefts: topographic correlationPlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open20142616410.1097/GOX.0000000000000119

21 

KR Chatura D Sravani K Shivayogi M Archana A clinicopathological insight of high-risk periocular basal cell carcinoma in a Central Karnataka tertiary care centerPathol Surg201851510.15713/ins.jmrps.140

22 

R Betti C Bruscagin E Inselvini C Crosti Basal cell carcinomas of covered and unusual sites of the bodyInt J Dermatol1997367503510.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00139.x

23 

P Robins H S Rabinovitz D Rigel Basal cell carcinoma on covered or unusual sites of the bodyDermatol Surg Oncol1981710803610.1111/j.1524-4725.1981.tb00170.x

24 

TR Wade AB Ackerman The many faces of basal cell carcinomaJ Dermatol Surg Oncol19784123810.1111/j.1524-4725.1978.tb00375.x

25 

AR Bowen PE Leboit Fibroepithelioma of pinkus is a fenestrated trichoblastomaAm J Dermatopathol20052721495410.1097/01.dad.0000138051.71415.fe

26 

AN Crowson Basal cell carcinoma: biology, morphology and clinical implicationsMod Pathol200619Suppl 21274710.1038/modpathol.3800512

27 

V Nikolaou AJ Stratigos H Tsao H Tsao Hereditary nonmelanoma skin cancerSemin Cutan Med Surg20123142041010.1016/j.sder.2012.08.005

28 

HM Haupt JB Stern MS Dilaimy Basal cell carcinoma: clues to its presence in histologic sections when the initial slide is nondiagnosticAm J Surg Pathol20002491291410.1097/00000478-200009000-00014

29 

RA Carr SM Taibjee DSA Sanders Basaloid skin tumours: Basal cell carcinomaCurr Diagn Pathol20071342527210.1016/j.cdip.2007.05.005



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 18-06-2023

Accepted : 21-08-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdpo.2023.031


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 834

PDF Downloaded: 310



Medical Abbreviation List