Introduction
Blood Transfusion service is the important part of health care system. However, the blood transfusion is not free of risks owing to human factors; thus, it should only be prescribed when patients’ clinical status really necessitates it.1 Internal quality control (IQC) is the backbone of the quality management program in the blood bank.2, 3 In the modern blood banking, quality controls of blood components ensure the high-quality yield with maximum efficacy to potential recipients.4 Processes and manuals are need to be highly focused on generating quality. The primary component in the quality control system is blood donation, which is collected from prospective donors of various ages with different demographics, health profiles, and risk behaviors. This blood collection process mainly depends on manual procedures which may have operator variations. Subsequently, these donations will be screened, stored, and transported under variant environmental circumstances. In recent years, there have been significant developments to improve the quality of the blood components. There have been advancement and progression in international standards for blood components, and principles of high-quality manufacturing practices have been redefined to provide the framework for quality in Blood Transfusion Services.
Transfusion service is a vital part of the health care system. Increasing advancement in the field of transfusion medicine has been enforcing measures to ensure quality of blood and blood components. In order to improve the standards of blood centres, well equipped blood centres with infrastructure and manpower is an essential requirement.5 All the blood components and the services provided by the blood centre should meet all quality criteria and as per guidelines.
The another most important for IQC is route cause analysis for IQC outliers.
Aims and Objectives
The aim of study is to highlight the importance of stringent donor screening to ensure safe and efficient blood transfusion to patients.
Materials and Methods
Quality control of blood components prepared between December 2019 to November 2021 were included in our study as per the prescribed guidelines. Monthly Quality control (QC) of the blood components were done as per the regulatory guideline. As per the same criteria, 1% of total RBCs, FFP and PLTs prepared and minimum 4 bags for Cryoprecipitate were carried out. Packed red cell units were evaluated for haematocrit, random donor platelet concentrates for yield and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryoprecipitate were evaluated for unit volume, factor VIII, and fibrinogen concentrations. Data were collected from IBBMS software available at the Blood Centre. Criteria used for Quality Control (QC) were according to National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare.
During this period, 43091 blood units from healthy blood donors were collected in sterile bags containing an anticoagulant CPD (citrate phosphate dextrose). All the donors were screened properly. After discarding less quantity and other non-eligible blood units, 42175 units of RBCs, 42250 units of FFP, 21809 units of PLTs and 5585 units of Cryoprecipitate were prepared as per institutional SOPs. Blood components which were used for products evaluation as shown in Table 1.
Results
During the study period 43091 units of whole blood collected and 42175 units of blood separated in the components. Components prepared comprised of 42175 units of RBC, 42250 units of FFP, 21809 units of Platelets and 5585 units of cryoprecipitates.
Total RBC (473) units, FFP (484) units, PLTs (255) units and Cryoprecipitate (90) units were randomly selected for internal Quality control. All components were evaluated on the day of expiry or near expiry (PLTs).
As mentioned in Table 1, during IQC testing, 95% of RBCs, 95% of PLT, 100% components for sterility matched the defined standards. In case of FFP, 100% FFP match for fibrinogen level and 99.2% of FFP could match the defined standard for factor VIII. For Cryoprecipitate, 100% Cryoprecipitate match for fibrinogen level and 91.2% of Cryoprecipitate could match the defined standard for factor VIII. As per regulatory guidelines, at least 75% of components should match or surpass the baseline quality standards.[Table 2]
Statistical analysis
All the data were compiled, tabulated and frequencies and percentages were calculated using Microsoft excel spreadsheet 2007 (12.0.4518.1014).
Ethical clearance
The current study was retrospective data analysis. The ethical clearance was taken from institutional ethical committee.
Table 1
Table 2
Blood Component |
QC criteria 5 |
IQC results obtained (Minimum) |
IQC results obtained (Maximum) |
RBC |
HCT-50-65% |
50 % |
77.7 % |
PLT |
4.5* 1010 |
4.5 * 1010 |
12.7 *1010 |
FFP- Factor VIII |
70 IU/Bag |
100 IU/Bag |
2464 IU/Bag |
FFP- Fibrinogen |
>200-400 mg |
247 mg |
14408 mg |
Cryo- Factor VIII |
80 IU/Bag |
82 IU/Bag |
2967 IU/Bag |
Cryo- Fibrinogen |
>150 mg/Bag |
196.74 mg/Bag |
7294.95 mg/Bag |
Blood culture & sterility |
No Growth |
No Growth |
No Growth |
Discussion
Blood centres have a dual responsibility primarily to meet the adequate blood supply for the needy patients and essentially to ensure maximum blood recipient’s safety.6 The safety and quality of blood components have been owing to advancement in technology in all regions of the manufacturing processes, practices, and manuals. Processes are highly focused on producing high quality products that are efficacious and are as safe as possible. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration commenced the concept of a “zero risk blood supply” as the manufacturing goal.7 IQC is the central component of quality assurance program in transfusion services. IQC is the procedures undertaken for continuously and concurrently assessing blood bank work and the results, to decide whether the performance is up to the mark. IQCs play a vital role in blood transfusion safety, and risks allied with blood transfusion can be substantially reduced by the implementation of IQC.8
Our present work is only an analysis improved IQC in blood products and its methods need to be studied furthermore.
Root Cause Analysis was performed whenever IQC was out of range and corrective measures were also taken.
Ferreira et al observed and recommended that in RBC, the problem with HCT content, so the technicians were advised to make sure that at least 50 ml plasma left at the end of 1st rotation during separation. So that RBC do not get too much concentrated or diluted.8 In the present study, authors also following same procedure since long.
In FFP, proper blast freezing was not occurred. So, the technical team was advised to keep one surface of FFP bag in direct contact with deep freeze -80° and proper transport of FFP from -80° to -40°.
In cryoprecipitate, dilution of segment might be cause for low factor VIII level. The technical team were advised proper stripping of segment before performing QC.
Whenever the authors found low platelet count in IQC, the clinicians were informed regarding that and they were advised to issue platelet concentrate as per clinical requirement. We are following same SOP.
Conclusion
From the results, it can be concluded that the quality of blood components being prepared at our blood centre meets the national standards. Safe blood management is absolutely essential, and it is a universal human right which can be achieved by all national health care systems through well trained, motivated staff, quality kits, equipment’s, facilities, efficient supervision, error and risk assessment system, good manufacturing practice guidelines, and adherence to standard operating procedures. For all processes in blood collection, quality indicators and objectives should be defined, regularly monitored, documented, evaluated, accounted, analysed and consequently implemented.