Get Permission Mahendran, Shanmugasamy, and Sowmya: Extradigital glomus tumour of the forearm- A rare site for an unusual tumour


Introduction

Soft tissue tumors are known to occur by varied presentations with atypical features, especially with regard to vascular tumors.1 The glomus tumour is an unusual benign neoplasm arising from smooth muscles of the perivascular glomus bodies. First reported by Masson in 1924, it has been said to represent hyperplastic growth of the glomus bodies. 1 They constitute approximately 5% of the soft tissue tumors occurring in the hand. 2 It is commonly seen in adults between 20-40 years of age and occurs equally in men and women. 3 Rarely are these tumors seen among the pediatric population. 4

While it is known to occur in the extremities, this tumour has a predilection for the sub-ungal region of fingers.5 Vascular tumors as such, especially glomus tumors presenting in extra digital sites are extremely rare. In literature only five cases are available on extra digital and few cases have been reported to involve the gastrointestinal tract, airways, shoulders, wrist, knees and elbows. 6, 7, 8 Classic cases present with a single nodule, but the occurrence of multiple nodules is not unusual.9, 10 Malignant transformation in these tumors are rare. 11 Patients usually present with tender and painful nodules which are sensitive to cold and few cases can also be asymptomatic having many clinical differentials. 12

Most tumors can be completely cured by excision. Recurrence rates are less and usually occur in cases where incomplete excision has been done. 13

This report discusses the clinical and histopathological features an extra digital glomus tumour of the forearm with atypical presentation.

Case Report

The patient presented with a painless swelling in the forearm of short duration. The swelling was superficial and not pulsatile. No radiological investigations were done. Initially thought to be a sebaceous cyst, the swelling was excised and sent for histopathological examination. Post up period was uneventful and so far the patient has not reported any recurrence. The specimen was received in our lab in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde. The lesion measured 1.5×1×0.5 cm, was skin attached and soft to firm in consistency. The specimen was completely embedded. Microscopic examination showed a well circumscribed tumour below the epidermis. The tumour cells were arranged in lobules interspersed with numerous thick and thin walled blood vessels (Figure 1a & b). Individual tumour cells had scanty eosinophilic cytoplasm, oval to round nucleus with evenly distributed chromatin (Figure 2). No mitotic activity was seen in the sections studied.

Figure 1

a & b: Well circumscribed tumor with cells arranged in lobules, interspersed with numerous thick and thin walled blood vessels.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/cffa02c6-b7d5-480d-8765-3888e6e531ecimage1.png
Figure 2

Individual tumour cells with scanty eosinophilic cytoplasm, oval to round nuclei with even chromatin

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/cffa02c6-b7d5-480d-8765-3888e6e531ecimage2.png

Discussion

The neuromyoarterial glomus body is a physiological arteriovenous shunt that regulates temperature 14 and is located in the reticular dermis. The structure known as Sucquet- Hoyer canal is the actual area of arteriovenous anastomosis and is lined by endothelial cells as well as muscle fibres lacking elastic lamina. Dispersed within the muscle are the glomus cells. The glomus tumour is an uncommon benign tumour arising from the glomus body or the Sucquet-Hoyer canal. There are similar terms for this tumour such as solid glomus tumour, glomangioma or a nonchromaffin paraganglioma. 12

Grossly these tumours are pinkish to purple in color with sizes varying from 0.2 -2 cm. Microscopic examination shows three components, glomus cells, blood vessels and smooth muscles in varying proportions. Based on the predominant component, these tumours may be categorized into three variants, namely, the solid variant (scanty smooth muscle and vascular component), glomangioma (with increased blood vessels) and glomangiomyoma (increased smooth muscles and blood vessels). Out of this the solid variant is the most common. 13

Masson was the first to elaborate on this lesion in the year 1924. 5 A meta-analysis showed varied sites for the occurrence of the tumour including the thigh (n=11), arm (n=9), abdomen (n=7), wrist and hand (n=7), calf and ankle (n=7), foot (n=4), buttock (n=3), lung (n=2), stomach (n=1) and the L3 vertebra (n=1). It was also noted that the frequency of the extradigital tumours were common among men than women. 15 Sub ungal tumours were found to be painful due to abundant nerve supply, a feature that was not commonly seen in extradigital tumours. 14 Notable cases of glomus tumours of the forearm reported in literature so far were mostly deep or intravascular.16, 17, 18 In 1991 Beham et al., reported the first known case of an intravascular glomus tumour in the forearm of a 40 year old man. 19 Le et al., reported a glomus tumour arising from the softtissue in the forearm of a 23 year old female which was confirmed by biopsy in the year 1995. 17

Extradigital lesions don’t have the typical clinical picture at the time of presentation and are difficult to diagnosis as encountered in our case.20 This usually leads to a delay or incorrect diagnosis. According to a retrospective study spanning across 20 years, it was found that only 9% of tumours were correctly diagnosed on initial examination. They were commonly misdiagnosed as haemangiomas, neurofibromas or neuromas. 21

Conclusion

To conclude, glomus tumours should be considered as a differential in any nodule occurring in the extradigital locations. Extradigital tumours need not present as a painful purplish nodule and can be asymptomatic. Surgeons and pathologists have to be aware about the varied presentation of these tumours so that misdiagnosis can be avoided and patient can undergo quicker diagnosis and treatment.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

A Proietti G Alì F Quilici P Bertoglio A Mussi G Fontanini Glomus tumor of the shoulder: a case report and review of the literatureOncology Letters20136410214

2 

R C Akgün U Ö Güler U Onay A glomus tumor anterior to the patellar tendon: a case reportActa Orthop Traumatol Turc2010443250310.3944/AOTT.2010.2174

3 

M Tsuneyoshi M Enjoji Glomus tumor. A clinicopathologic and electron microscopic studyCancer19825081601710.1002/1097-0142(19821015)50:8<1601::aid-cncr2820500823>3.0.co;2-5

4 

G Magliulo P Cristofari G Terranova Glomus tumor in pediatric ageInt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol1996381778010.1016/s0165-5876(96)01394-8

5 

K Beksaç L Dogan N Bozdogan G Dilek G G Akgul C Ozaslan Extradigital glomus tumor of thighCase Rep Surg20151310.1155/2015/638283

6 

K B Chen L Chen Glomus tumor in the stomach: a case report and review of the literatureOncol Lett20147617902

7 

N Aslam Z U Qazi A H Ahmad R U Khan Malignant glomus tumour of larynx: first case report and literature reviewJ Laryngology Otol20121267743610.1017/S0022215112000631

8 

J S Chun R Hong J A Kim Extradigital glomus tumor: a case reportMol Clin Oncol201322237910.3892/mco.2013.219

9 

E V Moor I Goldberg M Westreich Multiple glomus Tumor: a case Reports and review of the literatureAnn Plast Surg19994344368

10 

E R Chiang T H Chen Multiple glomus tumors in gastrocnemius muscle: a case report Arch Orthop Trauma Surg20081281293110.1007/s00402-007-0377-9

11 

J D Kayal R W Hampton D J Sheehan C V Washington Malignant glomus tumor: a case report and review of the literatureDermatol Surg200127983740

12 

J Goldblum S Weiss A L Folpe Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors20199780323610971

13 

Z Gombos P J Zhang Glomus tumor Arch Pathol Lab Med20081329144852

14 

J R Goldblum L W Lamps J K Mckenney J L Myers Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. 11th Edn.Elsevier Health Sciences20179780323263399

15 

A L Folpe J C Fanburg-Smith M Miettinen S W Weiss Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumorsAm J Surg Pathol200125112

16 

P B Googe W C Griffin Intravenous glomus tumor of the forearmJ Cutaneous Pathol199320435963

17 

Y Le Bellec F Yelles T Kapandji O Silbermann-Hoffman Glomus tumor of forearm: A case reportChirurgie de la Main200524299102

18 

H Kogure K Shirakura N Arisawa T Aramaki A Shimegi 3 deep-seated glomus tumors in the lower armActa Orthop Scand1996672194910.3109/17453679608994672

19 

A Beham C D Fletcher Intravascular glomus tumour: a previously undescribed phenomenon Virchows Archiv A19914181757

20 

D W Lee J H Yang S Chang C H Won M W Lee J H Choi Clinical and pathological characteristics of extradigital and digital glomus tumours: a retrospective comparative studyJ Eur Acad Dermatol Venereology2011251213927

21 

T K Schiefer W L Parker O A Anakwenze P C Amadio C Y Inwards R J Spinner Extradigital glomus tumors: a 20-year experienceMayo Clin Proc20068110133744Elsevier



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 10-01-2022

Accepted : 21-01-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdpo.2022.010


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 794

PDF Downloaded: 1075