- Visibility 386 Views
- Downloads 20 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.jdpo.2022.055
-
CrossMark
Histopathological study of lesions of appendix
Introduction
The appendix also known as true caecal apex, is named on account of its worm-like appearance. Evidence suggests that removal has no obvious ill effects.[1] Acute inflammation of vermiform appendix is the commonest cause of acute abdomen.[2] Importance of histopathological examination lies in unsuspected diagnosis that have a significant bearing on outcome and prognosis.[3] With this view in mind, the study was carried out to assess the value of routine histopathological examination of all surgically resected appendices.
Materials and Methods
The present study was carried out at our institute, over a span of 3 years i.e. (1st July 2016 to 30th June 2019). All the specimens of appendix of patients irrespective of age and sex were included in present study. In each case, gross findings including external examination for presence of exudate, perforation, dilatation, obstruction was done. One transverse and one longitudinal section were given in each case. The cut section was observed for luminal patency, presence of mucus and worms. Both the transverse as well as longitudinal sections were submitted for histopathology. The formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue blocks were cut using rotatory microtome and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The stained sections were examined by light microscopy. The histopathological findings were correlated with the clinical parameters.
Results
In this study, 1092 cases were studied. Appendectomy specimens constituted approximately 13.43% of all specimens. [Table 1] shows frequency distribution of lesions of appendix according to histopathology.
Chronic non-specific appendicitis
[Table 2] represents Age and sex distribution of cases of chronic appendicitis. Chronic non-specific appendicitis was most commonly seen in the age group of 11-30 years with female preponderance. Most of thepatients presented with complaints of pain and tenderness in right iliac fossa and in few patients there was no tenderness.
On gross examination of 523 cases, 381 showed congestion ([Figure 1]) and 142 were unremarkable. On microscopic examination, appendix showed hyperplastic lymphoid follicles with prominent germinal centers in the submucosa ([Figure 1]b) The wall of appendix showed infiltration by lymphocytes & plasma cells ([Figure 1]c)
Acute appendicitis
[Table 3] shows Distribution of cases of acute appendicitis. Out of 522 cases of acute appendicitis, most commonly encountered cases were of acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis (63.79%) followed by acute appendicitis with perforation peritonitis (35.44%). Table no. 4 shows age and sex distribution of cases of acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis. Most of the cases of acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis were seen in the age group of 21-30 years (39.63%) with slight male preponderance.
Acute appendicitis with perforation peritonitis (35.44%) was more common in the age group of 0-10 years and 71-80 years and was more frequent in males. The patients presented with complaints of fever, nausea, vomiting and right iliac fossa pain. On gross examination of 522 specimens most of the appendices were swollen and turgid. In 26 cases the external surfaces were covered with exudate and 62 showed sealed off perforation ([Figure 2]a) which were in the range 0.5-1.5cm and 1-2 cms away from the tip. On microscopic examination the mucosa showed ulceration and the wall of the appendix showed diffuse and dense infiltration by polymorphs and mononuclear cells. In cases of acute appendicitis with perforation peritonitis microscopic examination revealed areas of myonecrosis along with above findings ([Figure 2]b).
Other non-neoplastic lesions
Fibrous obliteration of appendix
We encountered 23 cases (2.10%) of fibrous obliteration of appendix more commonly seen in the age group of 31-40 years and showed female preponderence. Grossly, all the 23 cases showed obliterated lumen. On microscopic examination, appendix showed obliteration of the lumen by fibrous tissue along hypertrophied nerve bundle.
Chronic appendicitis with Enterobius Vemicularis infestation
Seven cases out of nine were clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis. However histopathology showed chronic appendicitis with Enterobius vermicularis infestation. Out of all 9 cases, 6 appendices were congested on external examination and 3 were unremarkable. All had a patent lumen and none of them showed evidence of E. vermicularis grossly. On microscopy, in all cases the parasite was luminal (Fig. 3) and one of the case also showed eggs in the lumen. 8 cases out of 9 were associated with chronic appendicitis.
Tuberculosis of appendix
Two cases (0.18%) were reported as Granulomatous appendicitis- Appendiceal tuberculosis. A 32-year female and a 46-year male clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis, grossly showed dark brown appearance. Microscopically both the appendices showed granulomas composed of epithelioid cells, histiocytes, Langhan’s type of giant cells and diffuse and dense infiltration by mononuclear cells with foci of caseous necrosis. ([Figure 4] a & b). Ziehl Neelsen stain showed Acid Fast Bacilli.
Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis
A single case (0.09%) was reported in a 52-year old female clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis. Appendix measured 5cm in length. The tip showed dark brown mass measuring 3.5x1.5x1.5 cm which was firm in consistency. Microscopy showed appendicular wall with diffuse and dense infiltration by polymorphs and mononuclear cells with a predominance of foamy histiocytes. ([Figure 5]). The periappendicial tissue showed extensive areas of fibrosis and foci of abscess formation.
Amoebic appendicitis
We reported a single case (0.09%) of acute amoebic appendicitis in a 30-year-old female, who presented with abdominal pain, fever and chills. Blood investigations showed neutrophilic leukocytosis. Microscopy showed extensive mucosal ulceration with luminal acute inflammatory exudate. The wall showed diffuse and dense infiltration by polymorphs, mononuclear cells with foci of myonecrosis and many trophozoite forms of Entamoeba histolytica in the exudate as well as throughout the wall. Some of the Entamoeba histolytica showed evidence of erythrophagocytosis. ([Figure 6])
Neoplastic lesions
Low grade mucinous neoplasm
Two cases (0.18%) were reported as low grade mucinous neoplasm. A 69-year old male, clinically diagnosed as subacute appendicitis and the other a 77-year old male, clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis. Grossly lumina of both the appendices were dilated and filled with mucin. ([Figure 7]a,b). On microscopic examination, the mucosa was lined by tall columnar epithelium with apical mucin and showed low grade dysplasia. The lamina propria showed pools of mucin which was seen dissecting the wall. ([Figure 7]c,d)
Serrated adenoma
A single case (0.09%) of serrated adenoma in 46-year-old female who was clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis was reported. Grossly the appendix was received in two pieces. Microscopic examination showed villous structures with irregularly branched crypts and dilatation at the base of crypts. There was no evidence of invasion and the muscularis mucosae were clearly intact. (Fig. 8a & 8b).
|
S.No. |
Histopathological Diagnosis |
No. of cases |
Percentage |
|
|
|
Non-neoplastic lesions |
|
1089 |
99.72% |
|
1 |
|
Chronic non-specific appendicitis |
527 |
48.27% |
|
2 |
|
Acute appendicitis |
522 |
47.80% |
|
3 |
|
Fibrous obliteration of appendix |
23 |
2.10% |
|
4 |
|
Chronic appendicitis with Enterobius vermicularis infestation |
09 |
0.83% |
|
5 |
|
Tuberculosis |
02 |
0.18% |
|
6 |
|
Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis |
01 |
0.09% |
|
7 |
|
Amoebic appendicitis |
01 |
0.09% |
|
8 |
|
No specific lesion (NSL) |
01 |
0.09% |
|
9 |
|
Autolysis |
03 |
0.27% |
|
|
Neoplastic lesions |
|
03 |
0.27 |
|
1 |
|
Low grade mucinous neoplasm |
02 |
0.18% |
|
2 |
|
Serrated adenoma |
01 |
0.09% |
|
|
|
Total |
1092 |
100 |
|
Age |
Males |
Females |
Total |
Percentage |
|
0-10 |
6 |
10 |
16 |
3.05 |
|
11-20 |
56 |
81 |
137 |
26.19 |
|
21-30 |
86 |
124 |
210 |
40.16 |
|
31-40 |
46 |
46 |
92 |
17.59 |
|
41-50 |
20 |
18 |
38 |
7.27 |
|
51-60 |
09 |
10 |
19 |
3.64 |
|
61-70 |
01 |
06 |
07 |
1.34 |
|
71-80 |
01 |
03 |
04 |
0.76 |
|
Total |
225 |
298 |
523 |
100 |
|
S.No. |
Diagnosis |
No. of cases |
Percentage for 522 cases |
Percentage for 1092 cases |
|
1 |
Acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis |
333 |
63.79 |
30.50% |
|
2 |
Acute appendicitis with perforation peritonitis |
185 |
35.44 |
16.94% |
|
3 |
Acute gangrenous appendicitis |
04 |
0.77 |
0.37 |
|
|
Total cases of acute appendicitis |
522 |
100 |
|
|
|
Total cases studied |
1092 |
|
47.80% |
|
Age |
Males |
Females |
Total |
Percentage |
|
0-10 |
08 |
5 |
13 |
3.90% |
|
11-20 |
43 |
40 |
83 |
24.92% |
|
21-30 |
74 |
58 |
132 |
39.63% |
|
31-40 |
32 |
27 |
59 |
17.71% |
|
41-50 |
21 |
4 |
25 |
7.50% |
|
51-60 |
05 |
6 |
11 |
3.30% |
|
61-70 |
02 |
4 |
6 |
1.80% |
|
71-80 |
02 |
1 |
3 |
0.90% |
|
81-90 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0.30% |
|
Total |
187 |
146 |
333 |
100 |
Discussion
Non-neoplastic lesions
The most common affliction was chronic non specific appendicitis (48.27%) followed by acute appendicitis (47.80%). Omotoso A J et al, 81 Kulkarni MP et al 69 reported frequency of chronic appendicitis as 48.0 % and 47.02% respectively, our study is comparable with these studies. Criteria for diagnosis of chronic appendicitis were evidence of chronic inflammation with infiltration of the muscle coat & serosa by lymphocytes & plasma cells. Fibrosis, alone cannot be sufficient to make diagnosis of chronic appendicitis as the amount of fibrous tissue in the appendix normally increases with age, as the lymphoid tissue regresses.[4] Although not considered a surgical emergency, it is often a missed diagnosis with complications such as perforation or abscess formation. Computed tomography (CT) scan is considered to be the best test for diagnosis. [5]
Acute appendicitis with or without periappendicitis constituted second largest category in our study (30.50%), Makaju Ret al,[6] Mehmood N et al,[7] Nikumbh DB et al,[8] Patel M.M et al.[9] reported frequency of acute appendicitis as 34.75 %, 30.6 %, 38.2 % and 35.5 % respectively. Our study results are comparable with these studies. In our study, the perforation rate of 35.44% and is comparable to that reported by I Chamisa (34.0%).[10] However, several studies reported lower rates. Higher perforation rate in our study, may be due late visit in the hospital in most of the cases. We reported 4 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis i.e. 0.37 % cases. The studies like Nikumbh DB et al,[8] Kulkarni MP et al,[11] and Elfaedy O et al. [12] reported the rates 0.4 %, 0.6%, and 0.6%. Our findings are comparable with these studies. However, Shrestha R et al [9] and Makaju R et al[6] reported it to be 18.7% and 16.99% respectively.
The obliterated appendix has been described under a plethora of terms such as Neurogenic appendicitis, Neuromatosis of the appendix, Neurogenic appendicopathy, Axial neuroma, and fibrous obliteration of appendix.[13] Appendiceal neuroma was described by P. Masson in an article published in American Journal of Pathology 2. In the article, he analyzed 1200 specimen of appendix that include normal and pathological specimens.[14], [15] We reported 23 cases (2.10%) of fibrous obliteration of appendix and our findings are concordant with the results of studies like Yilmaz M et al[16] and Kulkarni MP et al.[11]
The pinworm Enterobius vermicularis is the most common parasite reported to be associated with appendicitis estimated to affect up to 200 million people world wide.[16] The frequency of E. vermicularis infestation varies. It is higher in other studies. However, in our study it was 0.83 % and is comparable with the studies like Jones AE et al,[3] I Chamisa[10] and Emre A et al.[17] we reported 9 cases of E. vermicularis infestation, 7 were clinically diagnosed as acute appendicitis. Enterobius vermicularis is usually associated with eosinophilic infiltration and/or granuloma formation.[17] The presence of parasites in the appendix may cause appendiceal colic even without eliciting an acute inflammation. This colic due to a parasitic infestation is explained by the hypothesis of appendiceal lumen obstruction. The simple presence of E. vermicularis in the appendix usually produces symptoms which resemble acute appendicitis although the mechanism for this does not involve mucosal invasion by the parasite. [18]
We reported two cases (0.18%) of tuberculosis. Clinically one was diagnosed as acute appendicitis and other as perforation appendicitis. Various studies like AI- Fatah MA et al,[19] Nikumbh DB et al,[8] I Chamisa[10] and Makaju R et al.[6] quoted the frequency of 0.2%, 0.6% and 0.5%. Results of our studies are comparable with their findings.
Amoebic (Entamoeba histolytica) appendicitis is very rare, occurring in about 0.5% to 2% of acute appendicitis.[20] We reported a single case of acute amoebic appendicitis with a frequency of 0.09%. Other studies like I Chamisa [10] and Mandakini MP et al[11] reported frequency of 0.6% and 0.% respectively in their study.
Parasitic infestation by Ascaris Lumbricoides–associated appendicitis is likely a sequela of a high intestinal worm load, however, the presence of migrating Ascaris in the vermiform appendix can be seen as an incidental finding.
Xanthogranulomatous inflammation (XGI) is rare. The exact pathogenesis of XGI is not well known. It probably represents a chronic inflammatory process in which host and microorganism interact, that leads to tissue destruction and localized proliferation of macrophages containing large amounts of lipid, typically with bright yellow or golden yellow mass-like lesions associated with abscess cavities on macroscopic examination and characterized by presence of high number of foamy histiocytes admixed with lymphocytes and plasma cells and micro-abscesses. Differential diagnosis includes Malakoplakia containing foam cells. [21]
Neoplastic Lesions
In present study the frequency of neoplastic lesion was 0.27%. Mehmood N et al.[7] reported as 0.5%, Kulkarni MP et al.[11] as 0.6% and Nikumbh D.B. et al.[8] as 0.37 %. Our findings reported as are comparable with these studies.
Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a rare low grade malignancy accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal neoplasms found in less than 0.3%. It is commonly an incidental finding during operative exploration and is often diagnosed late. LAMNs are associated with diverticula, herniations, dissections, and rupture. The most feared complication is seeding of mucin into the adjacent peritoneum, leading to pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with a high rate of mortality.[22] We reported 2 (0.18 %) cases of low grade mucinous neoplasm in span of 3 years. Al-Fatah MA et al[19] reported 3 cases in the study of 460 cases with frequency of 0.7%.
Serrated and villous adenomas of the appendix appear to be highly aggressive lesions more aggressive than similar colonic and rectum adenomas. More recently Carr et al postulated that the precursor lesion in tumours of the appendix is probably a villous or a serrated adenoma. An adenoma has crenated, sawtooth-like structural changes in the dysplastic epithelium covering the basal aspect of the crypts of Lieberkuhn, as a result of epithelial infolding. When serrated fronds are present in more than 50% of the dysplastic structures, the adenoma is classified a serrated adenoma. The remaining adenomatous tissue usually shows metaplastic or villous structures. Recently Bariol et al reported that the diagnosis of serrated adenoma of the colon and rectum should include lesions having serrated structures in > 20% of the dysplastic crypts.[23] Single case (0.09%) of serrated adenoma was reported in our study. However, Kulkarni M.P et al.[11] found one case (0.22%) of adenoma out of 436 cases. Ma K.W et al.[24] reported single case of tubular adenoma in 1492 cases. Yilmaz M et al.[16] also reported single case of adenomatous polyp out of 1621 cases. Our study findings are concordant with these studies.
Conclusion
It is not only interesting, but humiliating fact that such a small organ with no known useful function; can so frequently be a cause of nuisance, which if neglected and not treated promptly may even give rise to fatal complications. Although neoplastic lesions constitute a very small portion of appendiceal lesions, they clinically simulate acute appendicitis. Hence histopathological examination remains the gold standard method. It not only serves the purpose of confirmation of clinical diagnosis but also discloses unusual findings that may not have been suspected clinically nor evident on gross examination. This additional information helps in subsequent clinical management of patients such as anti-helminthic treatment and endoscopic gastro-enterology follow up.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Source of Funding
None.
References
- D Theobald. The vestigiality of the human vermiform appendix: A modern reappraisal. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- PR O’ Connell, NS Willams, CJK Bulstrode. The vermiform appendix. Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery 2008. [Google Scholar]
- AE Jones, AW Phillips, JR Jarvis, K Sargen. The Value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- BC Morson, W. St.C.Symmers. The appendix. Systemic Pathology by Thirtyeight, Alimentary system 1978. [Google Scholar]
- JP Kothadia, S Katz, L Ginzburg. Chronic appendicitis: uncommon cause of chronic abdominal pain. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2015. [Google Scholar]
- R Makaju, A Mohammad, A Shakya. Acute appendicitis: Analysis of 518 histopathologically diagnosed cases at the Kathmandu University Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- N Mehmood, H Mushtaq, S Alam. Histopathological Analysis of Cases Presenting with Acute Appendicitis. J Islamabad Med Dent Coll 2014. [Google Scholar]
- DB Nikumbh, RY Thakur, S Singhavi, S Gondane. Histopathological Analysis of unusual Findings in Appendectomy Specimens: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review. Ann Pathol Lab Med 2016. [Google Scholar]
- R Shrestha, SR Ranabhat, M Tiwari. Histopathologic analysis of appendicectomy specimens. J Pathol Nepal 2012. [Google Scholar]
- I Chamisa. A clinicopathological review of 324 appendices removed for acute appendicitis in Durban, South Africa: a retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- MP Kulkarni, KR Sulhyan, SM Barodawala. Histopathological study of lesions of appendix. Int J Health Sci Res 2017. [Google Scholar]
- O Elfaedy, M Benkhadoura, A Elshaikhy, K Elgazwi. Impact of routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens on patient management: a study of 4012 appendectomy specimens. Turk J Surg 2019. [Google Scholar]
- BS Olson, S Holck. Neurogenous hyperplasia leading to appendical obliteration:an immunohistochemical study of 237 cases. Histopathology 1987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- S M Hairon. A case of appendiceal neuroma (fibrous obliteration of appendix). Br J Med Health Res 2016. [Google Scholar]
- P Masson. Carcinoids (argentaffin- cell tumors) and nerve hyperplasia of the appendicular mucosa. Am J Pathol 1928. [Google Scholar]
- M Yilmaz, S Akbulut, K Kutluturk, N Sahin, E Arabaci, C Ara. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens from patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol 2013. [Google Scholar]
- A Emre, S Akbulut, Z Bozdag, M Kanlioz, R Emre, N Sahin. Routine histopathologic examination of appendicectomy specimens: retrospective analysis of 1255 patients. Int Surg 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- E Efraimidou, A Gatopoulou, C Stamos, N Lirantzopoulos, G Kouklakis. Enterobius vermicularis infection of the appendix as a cause of acute appendicitis in a Greek adolescent: a case report. Cases J 2008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- M Abd Al-Fatah. Importance of histopathological evaluation of appendicectomy specimens. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2017. [Google Scholar]
- MA Hegazi, TA Patel. Acute amoebic appendicitis: case reports and review of parasitic appendicitis. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2013. [Google Scholar]
- V Singh, KM John, A Malik, T Pareek, V Dutta. Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis: Uncommon histological variant of a common entity. Med J Armed Forces India 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- HH Gonzalez, K Herard, MC Mijares. A rare case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: a case report. Cureus 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- CA Rubio. Serrated adenomas of the appendix. J Clin Pathol 2004. [Google Scholar]
- KW Ma, NH Chia, HW Yeung, MT Cheung. If not appendicitis, then what else it can be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendicectomies. Hong Kong Med J 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Chronic non-specific appendicitis
- Acute appendicitis
- Other non-neoplastic lesions
- Fibrous obliteration of appendix
- Chronic appendicitis with Enterobius Vemicularis infestation
- Tuberculosis of appendix
- Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis
- Amoebic appendicitis
- Neoplastic lesions
- Discussion
- Neoplastic Lesions
- Conclusion
- Conflict of Interest
- Source of Funding