- Visibility 283 Views
- Downloads 23 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.jdpo.2020.012
-
CrossMark
The histopathological approach to granulomatous skin lesions
Introduction
Granulomatous inflammation is a distinctive pattern of chronic inflammation due to tissue reaction against various organic and inorganic antigens, which are often resistant to be eliminated.[1]Granulomatous dermatitis frequently poses a diagnostic challenge to dermatopathologists, since an identical histologic picture is produced by several causes and conversely a single cause may produce varied histologic patterns.[2]However, good clinical history, histopathological examination and clinicopathological correlation is mandatory in arriving at a proper diagnosis so that appropriate treatment can be meted out.[3]Our study aimed at classifying the granulomatous dermatitis and a simple diagnostic histological approach has been worked out based on morphology of granuloma, presence of caseous necrosis, palisading necrosis, location of the granuloma and use of special stains.
Materials and Methods
The histopathological study of granulomatous dermatitis was carried out in histopathology department of Pathology, over a period of 2 years from May 2017 to April 2019. Most of the patient’s specimen for histopathological study in our institute were received from OPD and indoor patients from Skin, ENT, Orthopaedics and Surgery departments after incisional and excisional skin biopsies and other surgical procedures after taking written informed consent. This study was conducted with the permission of the institutional ethics committee and required procedures were performed according to the declaration of Helsinki. A study of total 580 cases of skin lesions was done.
For histopathological examination, specimens were received in 10% formalin. In histopathology department specimens were processed and sections were stained by Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. Special stains like Ziehl Neelson (ZN), Periodic acid Schiff (PAS), Fite Faraco, and Giemsa stain were used wherever required. The relevant clinical details and laboratory investigations were collected from the hospital records.
The cases diagnosed as granulomatous dermatitis were subclassified according to histomorphology into six types: 1) Tuberculoid, 2)Foreign body, 3) Suppurative, 4) Histoid, 5) Necrobiotic and 6) Sarcoidal type.
Results
On the basis of histomorphological features out of total 580 cases, 175 cases (30.17%) were diagnosed as granulomatous lesions. These 175 cases were then subclassified. Most common type was Tuberculoid type (62/175 cases, 35.43%), followed by Foreign body type (51/175 cases, 29.14%), Histoid type (42/175 cases, 24%), Suppurative type (16/175 cases, 9.14%), Necrobiotic type (03/175 cases, 1.71%) and Sarcoidal type (01/175 cases,0.57%).
| S. No. | Types of Granulomatous lesion | Number | percentage(%) |
| 1 | Tuberculoid type | 62 | 35.43 |
| 2 | Foreign body type | 51 | 29.14 |
| 3 | Histoid type | 42 | 24.00 |
| 4 | Suppurative type | 16 | 9.14 |
| 5 | Necrobiotic type | 03 | 1.71 |
| 6 | Sarcoidal type | 01 | 0.57 |
| Total | 175 | 100 |
Among Tuberculoid type majority of cases i.e. 40 out of 62 cases, 64.52% were of leprosy (Tuberculoid leprosy 21/40 cases, 52.50%; Borderline tuberculoid leprosy 17/40 cases,42.50%; Borderline borderline leprosy 02/40,5.0% cases), followed by 21 cases,33.87% of skin tuberculosis (Lupus vulgaris 17/21cases, 80.95%; Scrofuloderma 02/21 cases, 9.52%; and Tuberculosis verruca cutis 02/21 cases 9.52%). In 1 out of 62 cases (1.61%) combination of necrosis, giant cells and macrophages were present, forming tuberculoid granulomas in dermis. This case was positive on PAS staining, indicating Fungal etiology.
| S. No | Types | Number | Percentage(%) | |
| 1 | Leprosy | 40 | ||
| Tuberculoid leprosy | 21 | 52.50 | ||
| Borderline tuberculoid leprosy | 17 | 42.50 | ||
| Borderline borderline leprosy | 02 | 05.0 | ||
| 2 | Tuberculosis | 21 | ||
| Lupus vulgaris | 17 | 80.95 | ||
| Scrofuloderma | 02 | 09.52 | ||
| Tuberculosis verruca cutis | 02 | 09.52 | ||
| 3 | Fungal | Histoplasmosis | 01 | 01.61 |
Among the 51 cases of Foreign body type granulomas 42 cases, 82.35% were secondary to Ruptured epidermal inclusion cyst, 04 cases, 7.84% were secondary to leakage of keratinous contents from Pilomatricoma and in 05 cases, 9.80% granuloma was formed secondary to Foreign substance like horn and suture material.
| S. No | Types | Number | Percentage(%) |
| 1 | Ruptured epidermal inclusion cyst | 42 | 82.35 |
| 2 | Pilomatricoma | 04 | 07.84 |
| 3 | Others (non-biodegradable material) | 05 | 09.80 |
Among the 42 cases of Histoid type granulomas, we identified 17 cases, 40.48% of Lepromatous leprosy followed by 15 cases, 35.71% of Borderline lepromatous leprosy; 8 cases, 19.05% of Erythrma nodosum leprosum and 2 cases, 4.76% of Indeterminate leprosy.
| S. No | Type | Number | Percentage(%) |
| 1 | Lepromatous leprosy | 17 | 40.48 |
| 2 | Borderline lepromatous leprosy | 15 | 35.71 |
| 3 | Erythema nodosumleprosum | 08 | 19.05 |
| 4 | Indeterminate leprosy | 02 | 04.76 |
In the present study we diagnosed 16 cases of Suppurative granulomas, while 12 cases (75%)were secondary to fungal infections which was confirmed by their PAS positivity, 4 cases (25%) of suppurative granulomas revealed parasite and increase in number of eosinophils.
Three cases of Necrobiotic granulomas were identified which comprise of Granuloma annulare (1/3 cases, 33.33%) and of Rheumatoid skin nodules (2/3 cases, 66.67%).
One case of Sarcoidosis was diagnosed by morphology and special staining and was classified into sarcoidal type of granulomatous lesion.
A total of 175 cases of granulomatous dermatitis were identified, of which 120 cases (68.57%) were categorized in infectious granulomatous dermatitis and 55 cases (31.43%) into non-infectious dermatitis. The age of patients ranged from 10years to 75 years. Male (99/175) to female (76/175) ratio is 1.3: 1
| S. No | Type | Subtypes | Number | Percentage %) |
| Infectious | 120/175 | 68.57 | ||
| 1 | Tuberculosis | 21/120 | 17.50 | |
| 2 | Leprosy | 82/120 | 68.33 | |
| 3 | Fungal | 13/120 | 10.83 | |
| 4 | Parasitic | 04/120 | 03.33 | |
| Non-infectious | 55/175 | 31.43 | ||
| 1 | Ruptured epidermal inclusion cyst | 42/55 | 76.36 | |
| 2 | Pilomatricoma | 04/55 | 7.27 | |
| 3 | Granuloma annulare | 01/55 | 1.82 | |
| 4 | Horn/suture | 05/55 | 9.09 | |
| 5 | Rheumatoid nodule | 02/55 | 3.64 | |
| 6 | Sarcoidosis | 01/55 | 1.82 |
| S. No | Age group (years) | Number | Percentage (%) |
| 1 | 0-10 | 04 | 02.28 |
| 2 | 11-20 | 38 | 21.71 |
| 3 | 21-30 | 41 | 23.43 |
| 4 | 31-40 | 48 | 27.43 |
| 5 | 41-50 | 25 | 14.29 |
| 6 | 51-60 | 13 | 07.43 |
| 7 | 61-70 | 04 | 02.28 |
| 8 | >70 | 02 | 01.14 |
| Total | 175 |
Discussion
Granulomatous inflammation of skin comprises a spectrum of diseases sharing the common denominator of granuloma formation.[4] A granuloma is a collection of mononuclear cells usually as a result of type IV hypersensitivity reaction in response to an antigen or persistence of non-degradable product.[1]
Granulomatous diseases have been previously classified on the basis of pathophysiology, etiology, immunology and morphology. In the present study granulomatous dermatitis was classified using combination of histopathological findings and special staining.
Six histological types of granulomas were identified on the basis of the constituent cells and other changes within the granuloma: 1) Tuberculoid, 2) Foreign body type, 3) Suppurative, 4) Histoid, 5) Necrobiotic, 6) Sarcoidal.
Among tuberculoid type granuloma an attempt has been made to identify characteristic pattern of involvement among Tuberculosis verruca cutis, Lupus vulgaris, Scrofuloderma, Tuberculoid leprosy, Borderline tuberculoid leprosy and few fungal granulomas. Granuloma in Tuberculoid leprosy and Borderline tuberculoid leprosy are seen along the neurovascular bundles and superficial vascular plexus whereas granuloma of Tuberculosis verruca cutis, Lupus vulgaris, Scrofuloderma and fungal granulomas, usually involve full thickness of the dermis. Granulomas of Borderline tuberculoid leprosy donot infiltrate into the epidermis where as granulomas of Tuberculoid leprosy are seen infiltrating the epidermis.[5]
We further subdivided tuberculoid granulomas based on cell component predominantly epithelioid cells. In Tuberculosis verruca cutis and Lupus vulgaris epithelioid cells are present in fair number where as in fungal granulomas number of epithelioid cells are scant to absent.[5] Predominantly epithelioid cell granulomas with moderate necrosis were diagnosed as Tuberculosis verruca cutis and those with slight or absent necrosis were diagnosed as Lupus vulgaris. Scant or absent epithelioid cell granulomas were of fungal origin as proved by PAS stain.
ZN staining revealed presence of acid fast bacilli in Tuberculosis verruca cutis while in cases of Lupus vulgaris bacteria were present in small number or absent. FiteFaracostaining revealed scanty bacilli in Borderline tuberculoid leprosy. Bacilli were absent in case of Tuberculoid leprosy.[5]
The sex distribution pattern revealed that most of the patients were males (56.57%) which is in concordance with study of AmanjitBal et al[2] and Ashkakodnani et al[6]. The age distribution pattern revealed that maximum cases were in the age range of 31-40 years in contrast to the study of R.singh et al[7] where maximum biopsies received were in the age range of 41-60 years.
In the present study, largest group of lesions were of tuberculoid granuloma (62/175 cases, 35.43%). Similar findings were seen in the study of Srabanichakrabarti et al[1]. Second most common group of lesions in our study were of foreign body type granuloma (51/175 cases, 29.14%) which is in contrast to study of Srabanichakrabati et al[1]where second most common lesions were of necrobiotic type granulomas.
In our study, 68.57% cases (120/175) were due to infectious etiology and leprosy was the commonest specific cause (68.33%, 82/120 cases) which is similar to the findings of Jayawardhana et al (39.8%)[8] and AmanjitBal et al (72.4%)[2] second commonest infectious etiology was tuberculosis (21/120 cases, 17.50%). In series of R Singh et al[7], Amanjitbal et al[2] and Jayawardhana et al[8] similar findings were seen with incidence of tuberculosis being 42.31%, 23.1%, and 13.3% of cases respectively.
Conclusion
Histopathological approach along with special staining is gold standard for diagnosis and categorization of granulomatous skin lesions. The classical clinical features may be absent and identifying the agent may not be always possible hence adequate work up in combination with histopathology and special staining help in making correct specific diagnosis.
Source of funding
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- S Chakrabarti, S Pal, B Biswas, K Bose, S Pal, S Pathak. Clinico-Pathological Study of Cutaneous Granulomatous Lesions- a 5 yr Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India. Iran J Pathol 2016. [Google Scholar]
- A Bal, H Mohan, G P Dhamin. Infectious granulomatous dermatitis: A clinico pathological study. Indian J Dermatol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Karuna Gupta, Anita Kumari, Kalpana Mangal. Granulomatous Lesions: A Diagnostic Challenge To Dermatopathologists. Int J Med Res Professionals 2016. [Google Scholar]
- A Pokharel, I P Koirala. Necrobiotic granuloma: An update. Indian J Dermatopathology Diagn Dermatol 2018. [Google Scholar]
- S Lucas, D E Elder. Bacterial Diseases. Lever’s Histopathology of The Skin 2009. [Google Scholar]
- A Kodnani, J M Shah. A comparative overview of histopathology of granulomatous lesions of skin. Int J CLOIN Biomed Res 2016. [Google Scholar]
- R Singh, K Bharathi, R Bhat, C Udayashankar. The Histopathological Profile Of Non-Neoplastic Dermatological Disorders With Special Reference To Granulomatous Lesions - Study At A Tertiary Care Centre In Pondicherry. Int J Pathol 2012. [Google Scholar]
- M. P. G. N. S. Jayawardhana, R. T. A. W. Gunewardhana, N. V. I. Ratnatunga, M. Dissanayake. A histopathological analysis of granulomatous dermatoses – a single centre experience from Sri Lanka. J Diagn Pathol 2016. [Google Scholar]